Our research shows that rural Chinese women's labor supply falls for one year following the birth of a daughter before returning to pre-birth levels while the negative impact of a son on women's labor supply is larger and persists for four years. Furthermore, there is a decrease in household cigarette consumption, and an increase in the mother's probability of being in school, her leisure time, and her participation in decision-making following the birth of boys relative to daughters. These results are consistent with the idea that mothers are rewarded for giving birth to boys, leading them to have more leisure and work less.
Female labor force participation is considered an important marker for human development. Much of the economics literature focuses on policies and developments that increase female labor force participation (Jensen 2012; Heath and Mobarak 2015; Goldin and Katz 2000, 2002; Bailey 2006). However, data show declines in female labor force participation over periods of positive economic growth in countries such as India (Afridi, Dinkelman and Mahajan 2018; Fletcher, Pande and Moore 2017) and China (Wang 2019).
In recent research (Wang 2019), I examine how the birth of a son versus a daughter affects the labor force participation of women and men in rural China. This research question is important for policy given recent fertility changes in China. An unintended consequence of changing fertility is that the sex ratio at birth changes. My research shows that the sex of the child can have large effects on the labor market outcomes of women.
I find that women’s labor supply falls by about 5 percent for one year following the birth of a daughter (Panel B of Figure 1) before returning to pre-birth levels. The negative impact of a son on women’s labor supply (Panel A of Figure 1) is much larger than for a daughter and persists for five years. There are no corresponding declines in the labor supply of men immediately after the birth of either a son or a daughter (Figure 2).
Given these results, it does not seem to be the case that the story is about investing more in sons than in daughters, because households are not making other complementary investments that I can measure in breastfeeding and immunizations. The best explanation is that women are rewarded for having boys in rural China. Thus, women get more leisure time and work less in the field. Women in general tend to dislike smoking so the household reduces their smoking after women give birth to sons.
The estimates of this research suggest that there is a potential link between patterns in the sex ratio in China and female labor force participation over time. Thus, any policies that affect the sex ratio, such as changes in fines associated with additional children, may have unintended consequences on female labor force participation.
(Shing-Yi Wang is an Associate Professor of Business Economics and Public Policy at Wharton.)
References
Afridi, F., Dinkelman, T., & Mahajan, K. (2018). Why are Fewer Married Women Joining the Work Force in Rural India? A Decomposition Analysis over Two Decades. Journal of Population Economics, 31(3), 783–818.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00148-017-0671-y
Bailey, M. J. (2006). More Power to the Pill: The Impact of Contraceptive Freedom on Women’s Life Cycle Labor Supply. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1), 289–320.https://academic.oup.com/qje/article/121/1/289/1849021
Fletcher, E., Pande, R., & Moore, C. M. T. (2017). Women and Work in India: Descriptive Evidence and a Review of Potential Policies. SSRN Electronic Journal.https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/2624453/goldin_powerpill.pdf?sequence=4
Heath, R., & Mushfiq Mobarak, A. (2015). Manufacturing Growth and the Lives of Bangladeshi Women. Journal of Development Economics, 115, 1–15.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387815000085
Jensen, R. (2012). Do Labor Market Opportunities Affect Young Women’s Work and Family Decisions? Experimental Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(2), 753–792.https://www.nber.org/papers/w26185.pdf